Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Ocean | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 519 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than OPPO Find X2, having a overall score of 81 against 79.7. These devices come with Android OS, but the Galaxy XCover Pro has a newer 11 version and OPPO Find X2 has Android 10. The Galaxy XCover Pro is an extremely thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone than OPPO Find X2.
The OPPO Find X2 features a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has more RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 counts with a much better display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a little larger screen, a better amount of pixels per display inch and a better 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution.
OPPO Find X2 features a much better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the OPPO Find X2 also has a way bigger back camera sensor shooting way better quality photographs, a back facing camera with way more megapixels and a much better video resolution. OPPO Find X2 counts with more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 has a bit longer battery life than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 4% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.