Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Ocean | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 is just a bit better than TCL 20 Pro 5G, with a overall score of 79.7 against 76.1. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the OPPO Find X2 has the older 10 version and TCL 20 Pro 5G has Android 11. OPPO Find X2 is an older device than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, but Oppo was able to build it just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner.
The OPPO Find X2 has a sharper display than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have a same size display, the OPPO Find X2 also has a better resolution of 1440 x 3168 and a better quantity of pixels per display inch. The OPPO Find X2 features a bit faster processor than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G features much more storage capacity for applications and games than OPPO Find X2, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. TCL 20 Pro 5G has just a little better battery duration than OPPO Find X2, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4200mAh.
The OPPO Find X2 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same video resolution, a 48 mega-pixels back camera and the same sensor size, the OPPO Find X2 also has better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a bigger diafragm aperture for better images in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.