Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Ocean | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a general score of 86.6, which is a little bit better than OPPO Find X2's 79.7 score. Both phones in our current comparison work with the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding operating system features. Even though Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is a better device than OPPO Find X2, it must be told that it's also heavier and extremely thicker.
OPPO Find X2 counts with a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has a larger amount of RAM. The OPPO Find X2 has a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, and although they both have a display with the same size, the OPPO Find X2 also has a better resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels and a better count of pixels per inch in the screen.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 takes a little bit better videos and photos than OPPO Find X2, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting images or videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also counts with a larger sensor which provides a higher image and video quality and a back facing camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution.
The OPPO Find X2 has a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has just a bit better battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2, because it has a 12% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.