Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Galactic Silver and Starlight Black | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 975.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XR has a score of 82, which is slightly better than OPPO Find X3 Neo's 76 general score. Although it's the best we are comparing here, the iPhone XR design is much older, a little thicker and just a little bit heavier than OPPO Find X3 Neo. IPhone XR counts with a little faster processor than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of slower cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo has a bit sharper display than iPhone XR, because it has a little bit better pixel count per screen inch, a higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a quite larger display and way more brightness. OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone XR, because it has more internal storage.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo has a much better battery performance than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2942mAh. OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a much better camera than iPhone XR, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same aperture and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
IPhone XR is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.