Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Galactic Silver and Starlight Black | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 975.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is a bit better than OPPO Find X3 Neo's 76 general score. The LG V35 ThinQ construction is a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, even though it was released 3 years before. The OPPO Find X3 Neo features a bit better display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a much lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a bit bigger display.
OPPO Find X3 Neo has just a bit better processing power than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a greater amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X3 Neo has a superior camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for taking images and video in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with a way higher resolution back facing camera and better video frame rate.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a bigger storage to install applications and games than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. OPPO Find X3 Neo has improved battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, LG V35 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.