Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Galactic Silver and Starlight Black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 975.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, with a score of 83.8 against 76. Although the Samsung Galaxy A50 is older than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, it's design is just a little thinner and a little lighter. The OPPO Find X3 Neo has a little better processing power than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2400px resolution, a bit better pixel quantity per inch of display and a little bigger screen. The OPPO Find X3 Neo shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video definition and a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a little bit better memory capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Galaxy A50 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.