Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Galactic Silver and Starlight Black | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 975.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, having a 98 score against 76. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than OPPO Find X3 Neo, we must note that it is also an older, somewhat heavier and thicker cellphone. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version while OPPO Find X3 Neo has Android 11 version.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a processing unit that's very similar to the CPU in OPPO Find X3 Neo, both of them have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. OPPO Find X3 Neo has a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a little bit smaller display, a just a little lower pixel density and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes much better videos and photos than OPPO Find X3 Neo, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a way higher 108 mega pixels resolution back camera and a much higher video definition. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a quite bigger storage to store more games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a little bit longer battery duration than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot more expensive than OPPO Find X3 Neo, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.