Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Galactic Silver and Starlight Black | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 975.00 | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 has an overall score of 81.7, which is a bit better than OPPO Find X3 Neo's 76 score. The Samsung Galaxy S8 design has the same thickness than OPPO Find X3 Neo, but it's somewhat lighter. OPPO Find X3 Neo has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has more RAM memory.
OPPO Find X3 Neo features just a bit better display than Galaxy S8, because although it has a lot lesser pixels per inch in the screen and a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a bit bigger display. OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a superior camera than Galaxy S8, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and higher 60 fps video frame rates.
OPPO Find X3 Neo features a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy S8 is also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.