Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Galactic Silver and Starlight Black | Gold and Gray |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 975.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 Active has a score of 81.9, which is a bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Neo's overall score of 76. The Galaxy S8 Active is better than OPPO Find X3 Neo, we must tell that it is also much older, somewhat heavier and noticeably thicker. OPPO Find X3 Neo features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a lot worse quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a little larger display. OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting photographs or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with faster video frame rates and a back-facing camera with a much higher 50 megapixels resolution.
OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The OPPO Find X3 Neo features a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.