Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Galactic Silver and Starlight Black | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 975.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an overall score of 87.9, which is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Neo's 76 score. Although it's the best phone we are comparing here, we must highlight that it is also an older, somewhat heavier and thicker phone. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has older 10 version and OPPO Find X3 Neo has Android 11 version.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo features a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has more RAM. OPPO Find X3 Neo has a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with a brighter display and a just a little higher number of pixels in each inch of display.
OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures much clearer pictures and videos than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a much more mega-pixels camera.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.