Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-30 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 526 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 is a bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, getting an 85 score against 79.9. The iPhone 8 construction is notably lighter and thinner than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, even though it was released 4 years before. The iPhone 8 features a bit faster processing unit than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of slower cores, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
OPPO Find X3 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Apple iPhone 8, because it has much more pixels per inch of display, a really larger display and a way higher 1440 x 3216 resolution. The iPhone 8 and OPPO Find X3 Pro have incredibly similar memory capacity to install games and applications, both of them have equal internal storage capacity.
OPPO Find X3 Pro features a much better battery life than iPhone 8, because it has a 147 percent greater battery capacity. OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a much better camera than iPhone 8, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a same size diafragm aperture and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a much bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.