Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-30 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has a general score of 81.6, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro's 79.9 score. Even though the Google Pixel 2 is notably older than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, it's design is just a little bit thinner and lighter. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a little better processing power than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
OPPO Find X3 Pro features just a bit better display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a just a bit greater screen density, a lot higher 1440 x 3216 pixels resolution and a way bigger screen. OPPO Find X3 Pro features a much better storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because it has more internal storage.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. OPPO Find X3 Pro captures much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels, better video frame rate and a much larger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.