Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-30 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a score of 79.9, which is slightly better than the LG V30's 79.1 score. The OPPO Find X3 Pro construction is newer than LG V30's, although it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. OPPO Find X3 Pro has a little bit better hardware performance than LG V30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a little sharper display than LG V30, because although it has a little worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3216 and a little bigger display. The OPPO Find X3 Pro takes way better pictures and videos than LG V30, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a much better 50 megapixels resolution back facing camera, a way bigger camera sensor which gives a much better image and video quality and faster video frame rates.
LG V30 has a quite bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The OPPO Find X3 Pro has improved battery lifetime than LG V30, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.