Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-30 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is a little bit better than OPPO Find X3 Pro, with an 83.7 score against 79.9. LG V50 ThinQ is a just a little lighter cellphone than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, but both of them have the same thickness. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version and OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11 version.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a little bit better processing power than LG V50 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM. LG V50 ThinQ and OPPO Find X3 Pro feature similar screens, because although the LG V50 ThinQ has a quite lower 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better display pixels density.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a much bigger storage for games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. OPPO Find X3 Pro features just a little better battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 13 percent larger battery size.
OPPO Find X3 Pro shoots better photographs and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with way more MP and a much larger sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.