Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-30 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A7 (2018) has a global score of 84.2, which is a bit better than OPPO Find X3 Pro's global score of 79.9. The Galaxy A7 (2018) construction is somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, even though it was released 3 years before. OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has more RAM memory.
OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a better 1440 x 3216 resolution, a quite larger screen and a higher screen pixels density. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a camera in the back with a much better resolution, a way bigger back camera sensor and a lot higher video quality.
Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with just a bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. OPPO Find X3 Pro has greater battery performance than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.