Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-30 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 526 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, having a 91.8 score against 79.9. Both devices in this review have the same Android 11 operating system. The Galaxy A71 5G design is just a bit lighter and a bit thinner than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, although it was released only 9 months before.
OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit better processing power than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has more RAM. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a same size display, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a greater screen pixels density and a better 1440 x 3216 pixels resolution.
Galaxy A71 5G has a quite bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G and OPPO Find X3 Pro count with extremely similar batteries performance.
The Galaxy A71 5G features a little bit better camera than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera sensor which gives a worse image and video quality and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.