Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android |
| 2021-03-30 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Black and White |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a general score of 90.5, which is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro's global score of 79.9. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G's design has the same thickness than OPPO Find X3 Pro, but it's a bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G comes with Android OS, and OPPO Find X3 Pro comes with Android 11 OS.
OPPO Find X3 Pro features a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have a same size screen, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a better resolution of 1440 x 3216 pixels and more pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy A90 5G has a slightly better memory capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has more RAM memory. OPPO Find X3 Pro takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a higher resolution back-facing camera, a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, faster 60 fps video frame rate and a larger aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited environments.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G's battery life is just as good as OPPO Find X3 Pro's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.