Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-03-30 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro has a score of 81, which is slightly better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro's 79.9 general score. Both phones in this review have Android operating system, but the Galaxy C9 Pro has a more recent 6.0 Marshmallow version and OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11 version, providing some additional features and performance tweaks. Galaxy C9 Pro's design is somewhat thinner and just a little lighter than OPPO Find X3 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a better looking display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3216px, a little bigger display and a better number of pixels per display inch. OPPO Find X3 Pro features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro takes a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures and video in low light situations, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution camera. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a much better storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
OPPO Find X3 Pro features a little better battery life than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.