Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-30 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M30s is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, having an 83.3 score against 79.9. Despite of the fact Samsung Galaxy M30s is older and a bit thicker than OPPO Find X3 Pro, it's design is still just a little bit lighter. These devices include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both should provide the user very similar OS features.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has more RAM. OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3216px, a little bigger display and more pixels per display inch.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a slightly better camera than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a camera in the back with a better 50 megapixels resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture for better captures and videos in low-light environments, a way larger back camera sensor and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
The Galaxy M30s has greater battery lifetime than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.