Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-30 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M31 is slightly better than OPPO Find X3 Pro, having an 86.5 score against 79.9. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that. Samsung Galaxy M31's design is a little bit lighter than OPPO Find X3 Pro, but it is just a little thicker and was released just 13 months before.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M31, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has more RAM. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy M31, because it has a higher pixels quantity in each inch in the screen, a better 1440 x 3216 resolution and a little larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy M31 and OPPO Find X3 Pro count with incredibly similar cameras, because although the Samsung Galaxy M31 has worse 30 fps video frame rates and a smaller back camera sensor taking less light and duller colors, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and a same size aperture, it also counts with a lot better resolution camera in the back.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M31, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy M31 features greater battery lifetime than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.