Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-30 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, getting an 87.1 score against 79.9. Even being the best phone in this comparison, Galaxy Note9 is an a lot older, just a bit thicker and a little heavier phone than OPPO Find X3 Pro. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy Note9, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a just a bit better screen density, a quite larger display and a quite better 1440 x 3216 resolution. Galaxy Note9 counts with a slightly bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
OPPO Find X3 Pro has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a way bigger sensor taking lot better quality videos and photographs and a back-facing camera with way more MP.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 13% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.