Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-30 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 526 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is slightly better than OPPO Find X3 Pro, with a global score of 85.5 against 79.9. Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a lot older and a bit thicker than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, it's construction is still a little lighter. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a little better performance than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a better 1440 x 3216 resolution, a little bit bigger screen and a higher screen pixels density. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Find X3 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 256 GB.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a bigger aperture, a camera in the back with much more mega pixels and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a bit better battery performance than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.