Compare phones
Apple iPhone 5
16 GB| Global Score | |
| 64 | 68.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 7.x, 6.1, 6 |
| 2016-10-28 | 2012-09-12 |
| 6.02 x 2.93 x 0.26 inches | 4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 3.95 ounces |
| Gold and Pink | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 410.00 | $ 180.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 640 x 1136 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Apple A6 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Apple Swift (Dual-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 1016 MB (1066 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | PowerVR SGX543MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.19 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 4.4 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.20 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.40 aperture |
| -- | 33.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EV-DO B, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3010mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1440mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 225 hours standby time 8 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 3.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 5 is just a bit better than the OPPO R9s, with a global score of 68.8 against 64. The iPhone 5 has iOS 7.x operating system, while OPPO R9s counts with Android 6.0 Marshmallow operating system. Despite of the fact the iPhone 5 is noticeably older and thicker than OPPO R9s, it's body is still notably lighter.
OPPO R9s features a greater hardware performance than Apple iPhone 5, because it has 3,01 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of cores. The Apple iPhone 5 has a better screen than OPPO R9s, although it has a bit inferior number of pixels per inch of display, a way smaller display and a much lower resolution of 1136 x 640.
OPPO R9s counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 5, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. OPPO R9s captures much clearer photographs and videos than Apple iPhone 5, because it has a back camera with a lot better 16 mega pixels resolution, a much bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images in poorly lited environments and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The OPPO R9s counts with a very superior battery performance than Apple iPhone 5, because it has a 3010mAh battery capacity instead of 1440mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the iPhone 5 is also by far the cheapest one, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.