Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-10-28 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.02 x 2.93 x 0.26 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Gold and Pink | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 410.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3010mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a global score of 85.5, which is much better than OPPO R9s's global score of 64. Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is newer than the OPPO R9s, it's somewhat heavier and noticeably thicker. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit better processor than OPPO R9s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a slightly better display than OPPO R9s, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2246 and a quite higher pixels density. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with just a bit better camera than OPPO R9s, although it has a camera with lot less mega pixels, a tinier aperture and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than OPPO R9s, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 256 GB, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has 192 GB more internal storage. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has greater battery performance than OPPO R9s, because it has a 33 percent larger battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a little more expensive than OPPO R9s, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.