Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and Green | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 is better than OPPO Reno, with a global score of 85 against 72.8. IPhone 8's body is somewhat thinner and noticeably lighter than OPPO Reno, despite of the fact that it was released around a year before. IPhone 8 features a bit faster processing unit than OPPO Reno, because although it has less RAM and lesser cpu cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The iPhone 8 counts with a little bit better display than OPPO Reno, although it has a just a bit inferior pixels quantity per inch of display, a much lower 750 x 1334 resolution and a much smaller display. OPPO Reno captures better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and pictures, a larger aperture and a camera in the back with a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
OPPO Reno and Apple iPhone 8 count with very similar memory capacity to install games and applications, both of them have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage. The OPPO Reno has a very superior battery duration than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a 107% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.