Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P has a score of 80.3, which is much better than OPPO Reno's 72.8 overall score. Google Nexus 6P's construction is a little bit lighter and thinner than OPPO Reno, even though it was released many years before. The Google Nexus 6P has a little bit better looking screen than OPPO Reno, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
OPPO Reno features a bit more powerful processor than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Reno also has more RAM memory. OPPO Reno shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Reno also has a camera in the back with way more mega pixels, a larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a better photo and video quality and a larger aperture.
The OPPO Reno has a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 256 GB internal storage. OPPO Reno features a bit better battery duration than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 3765mAh battery size against 3450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.