Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and Green | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V20 has an overall score of 77, which is a little bit better than OPPO Reno's 72.8 score. LG V20 is an older phone than OPPO Reno, but LG managed to build it thinner and just a little lighter. The LG V20 counts with a bit better looking display than OPPO Reno, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater amount of pixels per inch of display.
OPPO Reno counts with a little bit better hardware performance than LG V20, because it has 4 more cores and 4 GB more RAM. LG V20 has a quite bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
OPPO Reno counts with a bit better battery performance than LG V20, because it has an 18% larger battery size. The OPPO Reno shoots much better videos and photos than LG V20, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno also has a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography and videos, a much bigger sensor shooting much better quality photos and a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.