Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30 is a bit better than the OPPO Reno, getting a overall score of 79.1 against 72.8. The LG V30 is an older cellphone than OPPO Reno, but LG could make it somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. LG V30 features a bit more vivid screen than OPPO Reno, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a greater screen pixel density.
The LG V30 features just a little better hardware performance than OPPO Reno, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores. OPPO Reno counts with a better camera than LG V30, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno also counts with a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels and a lot larger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The LG V30 counts with a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Reno, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. OPPO Reno counts with a little better battery duration than LG V30, because it has a 3765mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.