Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-05 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Green | Aurora black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is better than the OPPO Reno, with a overall score of 83.7 against 72.8. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version and OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie. LG V50 ThinQ is a just a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner phone than the OPPO Reno, even though both were released with only 1 months difference.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little bit better looking screen than OPPO Reno, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a better pixels amount in each inch in the display and a better 1440 x 3120 resolution. The LG V50 ThinQ features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than OPPO Reno, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with just a bit better hardware performance than OPPO Reno, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The OPPO Reno counts with a superior camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is worse for taking photos or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno also counts with a way bigger camera sensor capturing lot better quality photos and a much more mega pixels back camera.
LG V50 ThinQ has just a little better battery lifetime than OPPO Reno, because it has a 6 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.