Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android |
| 2019-06-05 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black and Green | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 403 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is better than the OPPO Reno's 72.8 general score. Galaxy A32 has Android operating system, while OPPO Reno comes with Android 9.0 Pie operating system. Even though the Galaxy A32 is newer than OPPO Reno, it is a little bit heavier and a little thicker.
The OPPO Reno counts with a brighter display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340. The OPPO Reno has a little faster CPU than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Reno also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Reno counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has improved battery life than OPPO Reno, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
OPPO Reno counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same video definition, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same resolution back camera, the OPPO Reno also has a bigger aperture to capture better photography and video in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.