Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and Green | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G has an overall score of 91.8, which is much better than the OPPO Reno's 72.8 score. The Galaxy A71 5G design weights the same than OPPO Reno, but it's just a little bit thinner. Both phones we are comparing here use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A71 5G has 11 version while OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a screen that's just as good as OPPO Reno's display, because although the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a little lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a quite bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy A71 5G features a bit superior CPU than OPPO Reno, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G shoots a bit better photos and videos than OPPO Reno, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality videos and photos and a back camera with lot more MP.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with improved battery duration than OPPO Reno, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.