Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and Green | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A80 is better than the OPPO Reno, having a overall score of 84.9 against 72.8. Samsung Galaxy A80 is a somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker cellphone than OPPO Reno. OPPO Reno has a little more vivid display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a little smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little higher pixel amount in each inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A80 features a processing unit that is very similar to the OPPO Reno one, they have 8 processing cores and a 8 GB RAM memory. OPPO Reno has a very superior memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A80 and OPPO Reno feature really similar battery performance, although the Galaxy A80 has a 2 percent smaller battery capacity.
The OPPO Reno takes clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a 0.5 inches sensor, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and a camera with a 48 mega pixels, the OPPO Reno also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures and video in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.