Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android |
| 2019-06-05 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is a lot better than OPPO Reno, with a 90.5 score against 72.8. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has Android OS, while OPPO Reno comes with Android 9.0 Pie OS. Although Samsung Galaxy A90 5G and the OPPO Reno were only released 3 months apart, Samsung Galaxy A90 5G's body is heavier but a little thinner.
OPPO Reno and Samsung Galaxy A90 5G both feature quite similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a just a bit worse pixel number in each inch of display, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Galaxy A90 5G has a little bit better hardware performance than OPPO Reno, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Galaxy A90 5G has a bit more memory for applications and games than OPPO Reno, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G takes a bit better photos and videos than OPPO Reno, although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs or videos in low light situations, they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same camera sensor size and a camera with a 48 mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features longer battery lifetime than OPPO Reno, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.