Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-06-05 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black and Gold |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro has a general score of 81, which is much better than OPPO Reno's general score of 72.8. Galaxy C9 Pro is a much older and a bit heavier cellphone than the OPPO Reno, but Samsung was able to build it extremely thinner anyway. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy C9 Pro has 6.0 Marshmallow version while OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie.
OPPO Reno counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Reno also has more RAM. OPPO Reno features a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a bit better display pixels density and a little bit larger display.
The OPPO Reno features a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. Galaxy C9 Pro has just a little bit longer battery performance than OPPO Reno, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3765mAh.
The OPPO Reno has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a much better video quality, a way more mega pixels camera and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light images and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.