Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-05 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30s is better than OPPO Reno, with an 83.3 score against 72.8. Galaxy M30s is a just a little heavier cellphone than the OPPO Reno, but they are equally thin. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy M30s has older 11 version and OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie. The OPPO Reno and the Galaxy M30s count with quite similar displays, both of them have a display of the same size, the same display pixel density and the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
The Galaxy M30s's CPU is just as good as the processing unit in OPPO Reno, and although the Galaxy M30s has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. OPPO Reno counts with a greater storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy M30s has a superior battery performance than OPPO Reno, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity. OPPO Reno takes clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same video resolution, a same size back camera sensor, a camera in the back with a 48 megapixels and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the OPPO Reno also has a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.