Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Black and Green | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 is much better than the OPPO Reno, with an 87.1 score against 72.8. Samsung Galaxy Note9 is a a little bit heavier phone than OPPO Reno, but both of them have the same thickness. Galaxy Note9 has a little faster processor than OPPO Reno, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a slightly better looking screen than OPPO Reno, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a better pixels amount per inch in the display. The Galaxy Note9 counts with a bit bigger storage for games and applications than OPPO Reno, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy Note9 has just a little better battery lifetime than OPPO Reno, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. OPPO Reno shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has lower video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Reno also counts with a much more mega pixels camera in the back and a much bigger camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.