Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a global score of 79.3, which is just a bit better than OPPO Reno's 72.8 overall score. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is an notably older cellphone than the OPPO Reno, but Samsung managed to build it way thinner and somewhat lighter. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has 5.1 version while OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie.
The OPPO Reno counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a larger number of faster cores and more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a better display than OPPO Reno, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and more pixels per inch of screen.
The OPPO Reno features a better camera than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the OPPO Reno also has a lot larger camera sensor capturing way higher quality pictures, a bigger aperture for better low-light captures and video and a camera in the back with much more MP.
OPPO Reno has a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. OPPO Reno features longer battery life than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 3765mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.