Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Blue and Red |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is much better than OPPO Reno, with an 85.5 score against 72.8. Xiaomi Pocophone F1's body has the same thickness than the OPPO Reno, but it's a bit lighter. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a slightly better screen than OPPO Reno, although it has a just a bit worse screen density, a little smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 2246px resolution.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than OPPO Reno, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 256 GB. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has just a little better hardware performance than OPPO Reno. They have the same number of cores and 8 GB of RAM.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a bit better battery duration than OPPO Reno, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3765mAh. OPPO Reno counts with a better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Reno also counts with a much larger sensor capturing lot better quality photos, a lot better resolution back camera and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.