Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Smoke black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Power has a general score of 76.1, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's global score of 72. Moto G Power's design is somewhat thicker and heavier than the OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but Moto G Power has the newer 11 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10, giving some extra features and enhanced performance.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory. OPPO Reno3 Pro features a brighter screen than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a display of the same size, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a bit more pixels per inch in the display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Motorola Moto G Power has more storage to install applications and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a lot larger camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
The Moto G Power features improved battery performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.