Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is a lot better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, getting a score of 89 against 72. Galaxy Note10 is a a little thinner and a bit lighter cellphone than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, even when both were released only a couple of months apart. Samsung Galaxy Note10 features just a bit better hardware performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro. They have 8 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a sharper screen than Galaxy Note10, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a little larger screen and a just a bit better pixels density. Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has worse video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot higher resolution back camera.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy Note10, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.