Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 9.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 has a general score of 93.4, which is way better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 global score. Galaxy S22's design is newer, just a little thinner and a little bit lighter than the OPPO Reno3 Pro. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 has a more recent 13 version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version, providing you a lot of extra features and increased performance.
Samsung Galaxy S22 has a bit more vivid display than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit better pixel amount per screen inch and a little brighter display. The Samsung Galaxy S22 and OPPO Reno3 Pro have very similar storage for apps and games, both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S22 features a bit better processor than OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Samsung Galaxy S22 takes a little bit better videos and photos than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has a lot worse 50 megapixels resolution back camera, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger back-facing camera sensor.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features just a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.