Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a general score of 90.6, which is a lot better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's overall score of 72. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 construction is newer and incredibly thinner than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's, but it is also much heavier. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has newer 11 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10, so it gives you a lot of extra features.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a more vivid display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2400px resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little better pixels amount per inch of display. Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has just a little better hardware performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM memory. Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit longer battery life than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 4400mAh battery size against 4025mAh. OPPO Reno3 Pro has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a much higher 64 MP resolution back-facing camera and a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.