Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Iceberg grey and Shadow black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a global score of 82.9, which is better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 score. Even being the best in our current comparison, we must note that it is also a a little bit thicker and heavier phone. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has newer 9.0 Pie version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with a little better processing power than OPPO Reno3 Pro. They have 8 CPU cores and a 8 GB RAM memory. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, and although they both have a same size screen, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has much more brightness, a little higher count of pixels in each inch in the display and a quite better 1080 x 2400px resolution.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a larger sensor providing a higher image quality and a much higher resolution camera.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro's storage capacity for apps and games is very similar to the OPPO Reno3 Pro one, both of them have the same internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro's battery life is very similar to the battery duration in OPPO Reno3 Pro, although the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.