Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 13 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 Pro is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12, with an 84.9 score against 71.5. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro is a just a little thinner and a little bit lighter phone than the OSCAL Tiger 12. Apple iPhone 11 Pro works with iOS 15.x operating system, and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 operating system.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro has a quite better performance than OSCAL Tiger 12, because although it has less cpu cores and less RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. OSCAL Tiger 12 features a more vivid display than iPhone 11 Pro, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels and a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger display and much more brightness.
IPhone 11 Pro counts with a better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a much less MP back facing camera. The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has a really longer battery duration than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3046mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.