Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12, with an 85 score against 71.5. The iPhone 8 is a incredibly lighter and thinner cellphone than OSCAL Tiger 12. The iPhone 8 has a bit superior CPU than OSCAL Tiger 12, because although it has lesser cores (although faster) and 6 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has an incredibly better display than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a really bigger screen, a bit more pixels per inch in the screen, a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 and much more display brightness. The iPhone 8 counts with a much better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a camera in the back with a way lower resolution.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone 8, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a way better battery duration than iPhone 8, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.