Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.73 x 3.06 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black Glare |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus SM8150-AC chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone II is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12, getting an 88 score against 71.5. Asus ROG Phone II's body is somewhat heavier and thicker than OSCAL Tiger 12. The Asus ROG Phone II counts with a bit faster processing unit than OSCAL Tiger 12, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Asus ROG Phone II also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
OSCAL Tiger 12 features a lot better looking screen than Asus ROG Phone II, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2460 resolution, much more brightness, a little bigger display and a bit higher screen density. The Asus ROG Phone II takes greater videos and photos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a way less mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Asus ROG Phone II has a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Asus ROG Phone II counts with longer battery performance than OSCAL Tiger 12, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.