Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has a score of 81.6, which is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12's overall score of 71.5. Google Pixel 2 is a much lighter and a little bit thinner cellphone than OSCAL Tiger 12. The Google Pixel 2's CPU is just as good as the processing unit in OSCAL Tiger 12, and although the Google Pixel 2 has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has a way better screen than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a just a bit inferior number of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a way bigger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px. Google Pixel 2 has a better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a back facing camera with a lot lower resolution.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a way better battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.