Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Blue and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12, having a score of 81.3 against 71.5. Google Pixel XL's design is a little bit thicker but somewhat lighter than OSCAL Tiger 12. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with just a little better processing power than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores (and also faster).
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much sharper display than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2460px resolution and a lot worse pixel quantity per display inch, it also counts with a larger screen. The Google Pixel XL counts with a better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a back camera with lot less MP resolution.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a superior memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.