Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 13 | Android 5.0 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.6 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 is a little bit better than OSCAL Tiger 12, with a 77.7 score against 71.5. The HTC One M9 is a incredibly lighter but thicker phone than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the HTC One M9 has the older 5.0 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13.
The HTC One M9 has a little better performance than OSCAL Tiger 12, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional GPU and a 64-bits CPU. OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a more vivid screen than HTC One M9, because although it has a just a bit inferior count of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a way bigger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels.
HTC One M9 takes much better videos and photos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a way lower 20 mega pixels resolution camera in the back. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One M9, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a superior battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has a 76% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.