Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V30 has a score of 79.1, which is better than the OSCAL Tiger 12's overall score of 71.5. LG V30 is a extremely lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than the OSCAL Tiger 12. OSCAL Tiger 12 features a much better looking display than LG V30, because although it has a much worse screen pixels density and a much lower 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
The LG V30 features a bit faster processor than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. OSCAL Tiger 12 has a little bit better storage to store more apps and games than LG V30, because although it has an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a much better battery lifetime than LG V30, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh. The LG V30 captures better photos and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a camera with lot less megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.